As scholars, we attempt to do top-notch research that will advance technology. We show up in what we believe are unique hypotheses, base our work with robust information and make use of an appropriate research methodology. Once we jot down our findings, we make an effort to offer theoretical insight, and share theoretical and practical implications about our work. Then we distribute our manuscript for book in a journal that is peer-reviewed.
For all, this is actually the part that is hardest of research.
Within my seven several years of research and training, We have seen several shortcomings in the manuscript planning and submission procedure that usually lead to research being rejected for book. Being conscious of these shortcomings will raise your odds of getting your manuscript posted and additionally raise your research profile and profession development.
In this specific article, meant for doctoral pupils along with other young scholars, We identify typical pitfalls and supply helpful solutions to organize more papers that are impactful. While there are lots of kinds of research articles, such as for example quick communications, review documents and so on, these guidelines consider planning a complete article (including a literature review), whether predicated on qualitative or quantitative methodology, through the perspective associated with administration, education, information sciences and social sciences procedures.